If you haven't seen it, this is worth watching, as Darko talks about integrating the KC62 with both the Passive and Active LS50s - and the effect that it has.
Be aware that not everybody loves the LS50 series. I don't and I've read other opinions that are pretty cool. It's not a speaker I could live with. I'd need a smoother and more organic overall sound.Thanks for all the further replies with your thoughts and suggestions.
I will try and home demo as much equipment as possible before pulling the trigger. On paper I still think the LS50w ii represents the best value for money.
Absolutely - it is a speaker that should not be bought blind.Be aware that not everybody loves the LS50 series. I don't and I've read other opinions that are pretty cool. It's not a speaker I could live with. I'd need a smoother and more organic overall sound.
Sounds about right to me. The LS50 series is very clean and detailed, which is probably why it has its fans, but it stops there for me. Call me old fashioned but I still like polypropylene cones as in the LS3/5A. Smoother, easier to design for and something you can live with. We've now been through all kinds of stiffer cone materials like aluminium, kevlar and various other ingenious types and sometimes they work and sometimes they just sound bright, for all their clarity. That's a killer for classical music, opera and voices.We all have different definitions as to what constitutes "Smooth and Organic" - but in my room, combined with Arcam and a Linn DS, IMO there is no forwardness in the presentation, otherwise it would have been out the door forthwith.
The character of the LS50 is hugely affected by the preceding equipment - so IME it can sound overly clean and analytical; or organic enough to sound correct with Classical Music (which makes up around 70% of my listening).Sounds about right to me. The LS50 series is very clean and detailed, which is probably why it has its fans, but it stops there for me. Call me old fashioned but I still like polypropylene cones as in the LS3/5A. Smoother, easier to design for and something you can live with. We've now been through all kinds of stiffer cone materials like aluminium, kevlar and various other ingenious types and sometimes they work and sometimes they just sound bright, for all their clarity. That's a killer for classical music, opera and voices.
Yes, don't buy speakers new without a home demo first. Buying used is often better as the price will be half of their new price and if it doesn't entirely suit your room, you can always sell on for little if any loss.Try not to buy blind. Get a home demo if possible. Unless you’re prepared to move the kit on (usually at a loss). Our theories as to what works ‘on paper’ don’t always play out as expected.
That's the one!I think this might be what you are talking about and they offer a very complex all in one package .
https://dynaudio.com/home-audio/focus/focus-10
How about a set of JBL of some sort I often think there speakers all sound ok at low levels ,3 k is a good wedge ,how about getting a go at say £1000 see how it goes . You might find a set of sleepers somewhere . Hope it goes well .Hi guys.
It looks like I'll be moving to a flat as previous planned move has fallen through; I will have neighbours both above and below.
In a bid to get a decent sounding system that only I can hear I'm after something that sounds good a lower volume levels. I presume something a bit more bass light would be a benefit?
Assuming the move goes ahead the room will be 20' x 13'. The speakers will be firing across the room width ways; seating position around 10' from speakers.
I'll be starting from scratch. Source will be purely music streaming (hopefully higher res & lossless). I would like to be able to hook the system up to the TV for general tv/film watching.
I'm keen to hear the KEF LS50W II. Any suggestions much appreciated. Prefer to spend under £3k and listen to all types of music but predominantly rock based and electronic.
Many thanks