dave

MEGASTORE MEMBER
  • Content Count

    421
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

94 Excellent

1 Follower

About dave

  • Rank
    incurable tinkerer
  • Birthday Private

Personal Info

  • Location
    cambs
  • Real Name
    dave

Wigwam Info

  • Turn Table
    Pioneer PL L1000
  • Tone Arm & Cartridge
    Shure M75
  • SUT / Phono Stage
    834p tweeked
  • Digital Source 1
    Rotel RCD950 tubed
  • Digital Source 2
    Teknica tv tuner
  • Pre-Amp
    tubed dynaco PAT4
  • Power Amp/s
    ECL86SE, various diy
  • My Speakers
    Wharfedale Dovedale
  • Trade Status
    I am not in the Hi-Fi trade

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. dave

    the wisdom of russ andrews.

    I personally suspect it has nothing to do with RFI. I wouldn't be surprised if one could find a cable with similar RFI rejection that sounded "different". Not that RFI rejection is a bad thing of course.
  2. dave

    Do your “standards” go higher as you upgrade?

    Not my area I am afraid. This is the bones of the original one... pre cad circuit...
  3. dave

    Do your “standards” go higher as you upgrade?

    I made a single ended transistor amp, 2 watts, my first independently made up by myself design, in 92. I always thought it it was good, but it has taken me till about 6 months ago to realise it really is one of the best amps I have heard, if a little limited in power. I guess what I am trying to say is that you don't always appreciate what you have at the time.
  4. dave

    Wharfedale Teasdale SP tweaking

    Very mysterious things have been happening, almost as if the woofer has been bedding in and becomming more like the original one. they have an amazing quality of pure sweet tone, so beguiling, probably the right word actually (just looked it up). But some thing not quite right, in that they are lovely, but not quite like anything else I have heard.... bit of a bump at 500Hz, graphic eq to the rescue again... 4dB cut at 500Hz, and 2 dB lift at 250Hz. I think it sounds a bit more "normal" now. Looks like I am going to have to adjust the cross over a bit. Never mind.
  5. dave

    Ken Ishiwata leaves Marantz

    Just reading the whf article, words of wisdom..... "Unfortunately, specifications don’t tell you about sound quality. That’s not just for DACs, it’s for everything. Those specifications are all based on static measurements, but music is dynamic and there are many other parameters that influence performance. " KI
  6. dave

    Bollox to most of the science - I'd like a new cable

    I see Max has been kind enough to include a description of how it is made. Very tempted to have a go at making a dumbed down, non cryo version my self.
  7. dave

    Wharfedale Teasdale SP tweaking

    Even though I have these running off my graphic eq to tone down the top a little, before I atack the crossover, and a transistor amp... They are now really rather good. Been listening to them all day pretty much. They now have a nice punchy and deep bass, which no longer overpowers the mid and treble. In fact rather the other way, hence the graphic to bring it down a couple of dBs above 500Hz. The un expected bonus of this is that now the sound has quite an acceptable balance in the room off axis, and if I angle them not straight at the listening hot seat, the balance is good there too. The mid and treble are very good, clean, transparent, with good resolving of quiet details. Yesterday, at work, I was wondering what my perfect speakers would actually sound like. I concluded that if they sounded like the sennheiser headphones I was listening to at that moment, that would be good. These speakers do actually sound very much like them now. How's that for instant manifestation?
  8. dave

    On the bench today.......

    Yes, quite right, I was retrospectively refering to the recalcitrant Sony 930 CD player. Forgotten I had left it in a dangling state of unworkingness, from the readers perspective.
  9. dave

    On the bench today.......

    Re cap time. The Sony, in the previous post, starting working again and seems fairly stable now. Unfortunately since it's last thrashing of the eternal cd player, the new direct coupled tube circuit is kicking ass, and leaves the Sony distinctly rough sounding in the highs. Rather deflates any interest I had in listening to it's filters.
  10. dave

    Wharfedale Teasdale SP tweaking

    Well that was quite easy and a little bit sad. I don't have many 8 inch woofers lying around, but I thought I would try an old Yamaha (cheap home cinema) subwoofer driver, I seem to have a number for some reason.... These measurements taken under carefully controlled conditions, it can be seen that the Yamaha (green trace) is about 4 dBs down, but also the breakup is much smoother going into the 500Hz crossover area. Also the bass seems a bit more extended. They have the same DC resistance, which is nice. So i dopped one in and yes, the vocal quality is improved. The tonal balance is a bit leaner now, but the bass is there when needed. I am going to live with them for a bit and see how I get on. I may have to drop the mid and tweeter 2 dB. I will reserve judgment as to whether I like the new version....
  11. dave

    Wharfedale Teasdale SP tweaking

    Probably the woofer. below a nearish field out of the box full range.
  12. dave

    Wharfedale Teasdale SP tweaking

    I think I am going to have to take them off line and do some probing. I have a problem with Helmholtz resonance, that I need to investigate further. Not the port, but the resonance of the bass driver hole. I have a plan now, and I will look in tho the crossover whilst it is in pieces. Been looking at this interesting document: https://lisafea.com/pdf/JMC-Helmholtz_Resonance--Re-ct2.pdf has given me some ideas to try. I was very interested that the Yamaha NS5000 seems to have some countermeasures to these sorts of issues, i think..... https://au.yamaha.com/en/products/contents/audio_visual/ns-5000/technology.html
  13. dave

    Wharfedale Teasdale SP tweaking

    I have a couple of pairs of these, and finally put them in my (not so anymore) valve rig. They don't like my ecl86 se amp. They do love my wide bandwidth, no loop feedback, class mainly A amp however, with a very sweet warm sound that I am really enjoying. However not all sweetness and light. The lovely tweeters are quite directional and the speakers sound quite dull off axis. Which is quite often in my case. Also the upper bass, lower mid sounds a bit muffled, particularly with female speech sounding wrong. I have performed a few measurements, including decay waterfalls, looking for driver problems, but did not see anything obvious. I can't help feeling that there is something going on in the bass mid crossover area. There is also the case. It is 1/2 inch chipboard, and quite lively. This shows up on a waterfall, holding the mic to the side, looking like ripples on water in the wind. The case does not open, so only access through the woofer hole. It could be nice to apply some damping or bracing. I am wondering about putting a tweeter on the back to help the dispersion. Any other ideas how to proceed? It would be nice to help it be just a little less woolly sounding In the bass mid, without upsetting the nice qualities. Male voice sounds adequate, if a little resonant.
  14. dave

    Are you keeping your old stuff alive?

    My stuff is pretty much 20-50 years old, except the home cinema, I have a new Blu-ray player and a recent HD projector. Possibly couple of 10-15 year old cd players.
  15. dave

    I dug out something very old from the loft.

    Yawn stretch, was looking forward to something like this.....