• advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
wizons

Query: can passive bi-amping cause damage if done incorrectly?

9 posts in this topic

I understand the view that passive bi-amping is a waste of time. However, over the last 3 years I've replaced all the components of my stereo system except my power amp (Quad 909). Indeed, I tried a Classe CA2200 in my system at home a while ago and actually prefer the sound of the Quad!

I now have a range of perfectly good components sitting unused in a spare room and have just bought a second hand 909 from Audio Emotion at a fantastic price. The plan is to use it in a second system. However, it will also be fun, if ultimately a waste of time, to try bi-amping with the 909.

My query is this: is there any risk that the two 909s might be inadvertently damaged by sharing outputs from the preamp? Here are the details: my preamp (Music First Classic) has two sets of outputs, call them A and B. The signal out from right channel A is simply wired with a one inch length of wire to signal out right channel B, and the same is true of left channel A and B. Using these two sets of outputs to bi-amp is effectively like using a Y-splitter. So, if I bi-amp by using one 909 to feed the woofers on both speakers and the other 909 to feed the midrange/tweeters, aren't the right channel inputs on both 909s connected at the preamp? Likewise, if I bi-amped by using one 909 per speaker and took preamp right channel from output A to one input on the 909 and took preamp right channel output B to the other input on the same 909 (and then used one set of poweramp speaker connectors to connect to the midrange/tweeters and the other to the woofers of the same speaker), aren't I effectively connecting the right and left channel inputs on the poweramp at the preamp end?

It might be that these problems are non-existent, but I'd thought I'd check before potentially causing any damage. I've checked with Music First who state there is no issue with impedance when using their preamp for biamping, and Quad stated the obvious, i.e., remove the connectors between the two sets of terminals on each speaker!

Many thanks for any help.

The Wiz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course they are sharing outputs. They couldn't be doing anything else.

Tel - I've edited the message since your speedy reply. Of course the preamp outputs are shared, but I have no idea if this a problem?

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to split the signal somewhere unless you are going for two preamps and two CD players, which could get messy!

The preamp is where it is usually done in a bi-amped setup - and yes, it is exactly like using a Y-cable between the pre and the two powers. They all work like this; you won't damage anything.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"is there any risk that the two 909s might be inadvertently damaged by sharing outputs from the preamp?"

Simple answer..................................NO!

Excellent!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know passive biamping is generally regarded as a waste of time, But when I used it, it worked a treat, This is why.

I wanted to drive the Apogee speakers I used back then (Stages ) with a valve amplifier but I didn't have one powerful enough to do the job properly, so I used a Perreaux solid state amp on the current hungry bass panels and a modest 35 watt valve amp on the mid / tweeter ribbon ,

it was bit of a faff but I enjoyed this set up for a couple of years and was better than

using the Perreaux on it's own.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know passive biamping is generally regarded as a waste of time, But when I used it, it worked a treat, This is why.

I wanted to drive the Apogee speakers I used back then (Stages ) with a valve amplifier but I didn't have one powerful enough to do the job properly, so I used a Perreaux solid state amp on the current hungry bass panels and a modest 35 watt valve amp on the mid / tweeter ribbon ,

it was bit of a faff but I enjoyed this set up for a couple of years and was better than

using the Perreaux on it's own.

Yes I've read about this approach. How did you balance the respective volume levels of each power amp? Doesn't an even balance between woofers and tweeters require power amps of exactly the same gain?

The Wiz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The valve amp was an integrated and was slightly more sensitive than the Perreaux, so all I had to do was back off the volume a little on the valve amp and all was well, like I say it was far from ideal, hence the big monster amps I have now, but however unlikely, it made a very nice noise.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.